Auto insurance

Drive with pet on your lap, risk getting ticketed

Wednesday, March 29, 2017by  Jon Osterberg

cute-dog-on-driver-lap.jpgFate provided my blog topic for today. Served it up on a silver platter.

Driving home from work last night, a white Acura merged onto the freeway ahead of me. Although the right lane was empty, he slid clear over into the far left lane, which I occupied because I'd just passed a car. He then set a 54-mph pace on the 60-mph freeway.

Frustration grew when I clearly saw him lift a hand-held smartphone, silhouetted against his windshield. I moved to the right and passed him. Glancing through his side window, I confirmed that his eyes were indeed on his phone, not the road.​

I also saw something else, on his lap. A dog. One of those little ankle-biter breeds.

Farther down the freeway ​I looked in my rear-view mirror to see a string of cars stuck behind the Acura.

I knew I had to blog about this when I spotted an article in today's Medford Mail Tribune, where a reader asked if it's legal for drivers to have dogs on their laps​. The short answer: no. Oregon has no law about dogs specifically. But there soon might be.

As the Mail Tribune reports, Sen. Bill Hansell, R-Athena, has introduced legislation reading, "A person commits the offense of driving with a dog in the driver's lap if the person is operating a motor vehicle on a highway or on premises open to the public and a dog is in the person's lap." It would be a traffic violation with a maximum fine of $250.
cop writing ticketEven if the bill fails, Oregon police can ticket you under the existing ORS 815.270, "Operating vehicle that is loaded or equipped to obstruct driver." A dog on the lap qualifies as "Interferes with control of the driving mechanism" and "Prevents the free, unhampered operation of the vehicle by the driver." The fine is $160.

Washington doesn't have a law that specifically prohibits pets on a driver's lap. But Washington does have a negligent driving law, RCW 46.61.525, that penalizes "failure to do something that a reasonably careful person would do under the same or similar circumstances." That will set you back $250.

Of course, that assumes a reasonably careful driver would not drive with a pet on his or her lap.

Do I assume too much?

Share on social media

Comments on this post

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!

Add your comment

At PEMCO, we believe that maintaining the confidentiality of personal information is a fundamental responsibility. View our privacy policy.